Inventarisnummer
TM-2289-3
Edo designations
English designations
Altar Tusk
Categories
Altar & Shrine Objects
Location
1 Adesogbe (Plymouth) Road, P.M.B. 1115, Benin City , Edo State
Loading...

Iconographies

8 annotations
Ukpan obọ eva
Crossed Beaded Baldrics

The Ukpan obọ eva (coral-bead crossed baldrics) were worn as part of the ehaingbehia, the full ceremonial regalia, by only high-ranking members of the palace, including the Ọba himself, the Iy’Ọba, the Edaiken, and the Ezọmọ (Ben-Amos 1999, pp. 68, 141; Osadolor in Plankensteiner 2007, cat. no. 70, pp. 322–323).

1 annotation
Ukpan obọ eva
Uhunmwu-Ẹkuẹ
Pendant Mask

Uhunmwu-Ẹkuẹ (pendant masks) formed part of the ceremonial regalia worn by court dignitaries to indicate their rank or function and are frequently represented among the Emwin Arhe (royal treasures), particularly those made of brass, bronze, or ivory.

Different animals were depicted on Uhunmwu-Ẹkuẹ, particularly the heads of leopards and crocodiles. The most common type features the face or head of an Ọba. Other examples take the form of an elephant head incorporating the trunk-hand motif, a ram’s head, or, in a very small number of cases, the face of a Portuguese man. Different figures appear to have worn Uhunmwu-Ẹkuẹ with different imagery. For example, warrior chiefs are often depicted wearing leopard-head pendant masks, whereas crocodile-head Uhunmwu-Ẹkuẹ are generally shown being worn only by the Ọba and his Enọbare (Blackmun 2007, cat. no. 137, p. 365).

1 annotation
Uhunmwu-Ẹkuẹ
Iviawẹ
Stacked Beaded Anklet

Ọba gha ye Ivie gie ọwan, ẹ ghi tama rẹn ehe nọ gha bae yi (When the Ọba gifts you a bead, he doesn’t tell you how to wear it) (Daniel Inneh, pers. comm., 27 September 2025).

Iviawẹ (also spelled ĺvîowẹ) are coral-beaded anklets, often worn stacked together (Aigbe 1985, p. 28; Okpokunu, Agbontaen-Eghafona & Ojo 2005, p. 162; Ọbazee 2025, p. 279). Many of the figures depicted on the Emwin Arhe (royal treasures) in brass, bronze, ivory, and wood are shown wearing these. According to Daniel Inneh (pers. comm., 27 September 2025), beads were sent to people whom the Ọba wished to honour, although there was no directive on how to wear them.

Mostly, people who wear Iviawẹ are identified as palace chiefs or priests and priestesses. However, today anyone can wear them as cultural identifiers or fashion pieces.

1 annotation
Iviawẹ
Uman-ague
Equal-armed cross

Uman-ague is a badge in the form of an equal-armed cross. The cross with straight-sided arms is known as the “Greek cross,” while the type with V-shaped arms, narrowing toward the centre, is known as the “Maltese cross.”

Uman-ague is usually worn around the neck by members of the Ewua or by the Ohensa ( ). The equal-armed cross has various meanings: as a symbol of cosmic order, it represents the number four and references the “four cardinal points established by the High God Osanobua when he created the world” (Girshick Ben-Amos 1999, p. 64), as well as the “crossroads or junction that serves as the point of connection between the natural and spiritual worlds” ( ). Paula Girshick Ben-Amos ( ) also argues that when used on the Aken'ni Elao (altar tusk), the cross, together with the Ivie okpagbaru (royal bead), constitutes an “emblematic reference” to Ọba Ẹsigie.

The cross also references the Portuguese missionaries who brought Christianity to the Kingdom during the reign of Ọba Ẹsigie, although the symbol was already in use before the arrival of Europeans ( ). The Maltese cross is thought to have been introduced by Ọba Eresonyẹn as part of his efforts to encourage the worship of the High God Osanobua during his reign ( ; ). Regardless, Uman-ague is often associated with Ọba Ẹsigie.

1 annotation
Uman-ague
Colar Bead
Odigba
Coral beaded collar

Odigba (coral-beaded collar) is a rigid neck collar made of coral beads, worn as part of ceremonial attire only by senior princes who have been made Enigie (Inneh 2007, p. 107). Although Ibafe (2007, p. 43) argued that the Odigba was introduced during the Ogiso period (c. 900–c. 1170 AD) by Ogiso Ere, along with other symbolically important Emwin Arhe, such as the Ada (ceremonial sword) and the Ẹbẹn (ceremonial sword), this seems unlikely, as coral was only introduced in the late 15th century through trade with Portuguese merchants.

1 annotation
Odigba
Ewi
Mudfish

Depictions of Ewi (mudfish) are among the most frequent motifs in the Emwin Arhe (royal treasures). Mudfish hold an important place in Edo belief, both as representations of the god Olokun and as symbols of royalty (Plankensteiner 2007, p. 410), as well as of “prosperity, peace, well-being and fertility” (Ben-Amos 1976, p. 245). Mudfish are also particularly common animals for sacrifice, and mudfish-shaped Orhiẹvbẹ (kola-nut boxes) were used to make offerings or store kola nuts.

Yet, the appearance of Ewi across the Emwin Arhe is not consistent, and it has been argued that different species of mudfish were depicted by Edo artists, each with different qualities and capabilities. For example, the electric shock of Malapterurus electricus resembles the fierceness of the Ọba, while the liminal qualities of the Synodontis clarias mudfish, which lives both on land and in water, similarly reflect the Ọba’s rule over land and sea (Gallagher 1983, p. 93). With these different qualities in mind, the mudfish is an important symbol of Benin kingship and royalty.

Sometimes the Ọba was depicted by artists with mudfish rather than legs (see Ọba with Mudfish Legs).

1 annotation
Ewi
Ubanu'hi / Obanu'hi
Ubanu'hi / Obanu'hi
Inifinity Symbol

The Ubanu'hi (infinity symbol) is a kind of guilloche or interlaced strapwork motif that can be angular or rounded. It was used by Edo artists in the decoration of many Emwin Arhe (royal treasures) and is ubiquitous in Benin royal arts. Ubanu'hi is a shortened form of “uba no Ọba ya de agbon ke ehimwin yi”, which means “the rope with which the Ọba ties the heaven and earth together” (pers. comm. Chief John Igbineweka Inneh n’Igbesawman, 2022). Similarly, Paula Ben-Amos Girshick (in Plankensteiner 2007, pp. 339, 341) described this as “Ọba n’iri agbon”, or the “rope of the world” pattern.

According to Ọbabanmu Ineh (in Blackmun 1984, p. 51), the use of this motif indicates that objects were carved by members of the Igbesanmwan. However, the motif is found on all types of Emwin Arhe (royal treasures), not only those made of ivory or wood. On the flanges of the Ama (relief plaques) alone, Kathryn Gunsch (2018, pp. 75–77) identified three different versions of the Ubanu'hi and, through her analysis of over 850 plaques, found that these different Ubanu'hi forms align with other characteristics, such as dimensions, the prevalence of ornamental motifs, and stylistic qualities. Together, these provide evidence, she argues, of different production groups among the plaque makers .

Kate Ezra (1992, pp. 209, 264) went on to argue that the use of these motifs indicates that certain objects were used in a “royal context” and were associated with “royal patronage”.

1 annotation
Ubanu'hi / Obanu'hi
Umọmọ
Hammer

The Umọmọ is an L-shaped hammer made of iron that holds profound importance, symbolising power, transformation, and spiritual efficacy. The hammer is fundamentally associated with Ogun, the god of iron, embodying “the force inherent in metal, [with] a mystical power with the potential to create or destroy” ( ). This dual aspect of the hammer—its capacity for both shaping and destruction—mirrors the formidable power of the Ọba. The L-shaped hammer is often associated specifically with Ọba Eresonyẹn, as it most commonly appears within the visual language of Emwin Arhe (royal treasures) that he commissioned, for example, held by Ewua figures and on one ornate cast Ẹrhẹ, thought to have been Ọba Eresonyẹn’s throne (id. no. 209779) ( ).

The hammer is notably held by figures identified as Ewua palace officials or Ohensa priests, who also wear a cross pendant on their chests. The consistent portrayal of these figures holding the Umọmọ underscores its connection to the origins of the Benin dynasty and the spiritual authority of the Ọba. Ọba Esigie, the powerful 16th-century “warrior king”, is credited with encouraging ironworking, further solidifying the hammer’s link to royal martial strength and divine kingship.

Appearing on Aken'ni Elao (carved ivory tusks), Ama-Ẹrọnmwọn (bronze relief plaques), and even as a charm, the hammer symbolises the Ọba’s ability to “mold and transform” events, to overcome challenges, and to provide spiritual protection ( ). Its presence thus reinforces the complex interplay of hierarchy, spiritual authority, and military might within the Benin Kingdom, consistent with other potent symbols such as the Akọn Ẹkpẹn (leopard’s tooth neck ornament). The Umọmọ often appears on Emwin Arhe (royal treasures) believed to have been commissioned during the reign of Ọba Eresonyẹn ( ; ).

Other terms for hammer in Edo are Avan or Avalaka ( ), which are used interchangeably with Umọmọ by members of the Igun-Ẹrọnmwọn.

1 annotation
Umọmọ

Provenance

5 events
Production
1750 (year uncertain/approximate) to February 22, 1897 (day approximate)
The object was produced by Unknown member(s) of the Igbesamwan guild in Benin City.
Looted
February 22, 1897 (day approximate) to June 1899 (year approximate)
The object was looted by February 1897 Unknown member of the British colonial military campaign on Benin from Benin Kingdom.
Unknown
February 22, 1897 (day approximate) to November 16, 1953
The object is known to have come into contact with Edinburgh Royal Scottish Museum, later in Edinburgh.
Gift
November 16, 1953
The object was given as a gift by Edinburgh Royal Scottish Museum to the Nationaal Museum van Wereldculturen and Wereldmuseum from Edinburgh to Amsterdam.
Restitution
June 21, 2025
The object was restituted by the Nationaal Museum van Wereldculturen and Wereldmuseum to the Omo n'Oba n'Edo Uku Akpolokpolo, Ọba of Benin & National Commission for Museums and Monuments, Nigeria through Olugbile Holloway and Eppo Bruins from Netherlands to Nigeria.

Institution data

Nationaal Museum van Wereldculturen and Wereldmuseum
The data was transferred directly by the institution.
Last updated: 2022-07-19
Language: dutch
Institution fieldValue
Inventarisnummer
object id
TM-2289-3
Objectnaam
designation
object type
Olifantstand / reliëf
Titel
designation
object type
Deel van een bewerkte olifantsslagtand
Associatie/beschrijving (online getoond)
description
Het object bestaat uit het onderste gedeelte van een bewerkte olifantsslagtand. De top van de tand is afgezaagd. Er zijn twee rijen figuren op te zien. De centrale figuur van de bovenste rij is een Oba, herkenbaar aan de dubbele gekruisde banden over de b
Materiaal en techniek (NB: ook thesaurustermen aanpassen!)
material
ivoor
Afmetingenlabel (H x B x D)
dimensions
Datering
date made
1500-1897
Verzamelgeschiedenis (toelichting)
provenance
'The Royal Scottish Museum in Edinburgh donated an elephant’s tusk (TM-2289-3) to the Tropenmuseum on 16 November 1953. This gift was listed in the acquisition register of 18 November 1953 together with two others: TM-2289-1 and TM-2289-2 (AQR-A 1948-1954: TM-1832-*to TM-2386-*). The description intriguingly states: ‘Via Dr Jager Gerlings during visit to England. Personally transported luggage, airplane.’ (Translated from Dutch: ‘Via Dr Jager Gerlings tijdens bezoek Engeland. Persoonlijk medegebracht bagage, vliegtuig’ (AQR-A: NLHaNA-KIT-7881). The British connection together with the number 26033 at the bottom makes a connection to the Wellcome collection the most likely explanation, as existing registers in Edinburgh do not provide any further clarification. Batches of this large and diverse collection came into the Royal Scottish Museum in different years including 1949 and 1953, not all of which were accessioned into the permanent collection. Several Wellcome collections objects in the British Museum have similarly high numbers (see for example The British Museum 2020a, b). At the time of acquisition, the tusk was already damaged and the Dutch inventory card states: ‘The tusk is discoloured on one side probably during the fire in 1897.’ (Translated from Dutch: ‘De slagtand is aan één zijde waarschijnlijk tijdens de brand van 1897 door vuur verkleurd’ (TM-2289-3: inventory card).' (Excerpt from Provenance no. 2 'The Benin Collections at the National Museum of World Cultures written by Rosalie Hans with Annette Schmidt, 21-01-2021). Information in addition to report published in March 2021 as Provenance #2, Benin. Wellcome accession register While researching Magdala I discovered that the original Wellcome number of this piece in a Wellcome accession register online: https://wellcomecollection.org/works/g5bpkwcm/items. The number is 26033 which can be found at the bottom of the object. The assumption was made in the report that this must be a Wellcome number but the description in the accession register confirms this: Figure 1: Museum accessions Vol. 4:13001-18000 Figure 2: Museum accessions Vol 4: 13001-18000 The line starting with ‘Privately […]’ is the one corresponding with 26033 and further confirms the identity of the tusk because we know it is damaged. The full pages can be found in the folder Rosalie Hans documenten > Benin > TM-2289-3_2021 info. Wellcome documentation: P.S & N.15/X/1925 Lot 278 I was unable to find correspondence related to the code mentioned in the accession register so I contacted the Wellcome Library (library@wellcomecollection.org) and received an extensive reply. Due to time constraints I am copying the information below. The email was written by librarian Nicola Cook (collections@wellcomecollection.org) on 10 August 2021: ‘In addition to the museum accession register you identified, there is also a corresponding inventory index card: https://wellcomecollection.org/works/fv79c2rr/items?canvas=147. The information is very similar, but the part which you reference as “P.S […] N./278/15.X.1925” is more clearly type-written here. Essentially, what “P.S & N.15/X/1925 Lot 278” this represents is that the item was “privately” purchased from the auction house Philips, Son & Neale on 15 Oct 1925, and the lot number is 278. The sales catalogue is currently being digitised but eventually it will be available to view online here: https://wellcomecollection.org/works/kh3fx5d8. I’ve managed to track down the sales catalogue with our digitisation team and attach some photos of the front cover and the lot for them item for now. I’ve also liaised with our super knowledgeable colleague Ruth Horry about what the term “privately purchased” might have meant, particularly in relation to Henry Wellcome’s purchasing strategies. One meaning of “privately purchased” usually refers to a private sale held by the auction house. So rather than a public auction sale, the auction house effectively acts like an intermediary dealer and the seller and selling price remain private. Given that this item is listed as a specific lot in the Phillips, Son & Neale catalogue, it could be that it never made it to the public saleroom – but we can’t confirm this though, it’s just an assumption. Ruth has also deciphered the annotations on the sales catalogue for me and I’ll do my best to explain what some of it means: On the front cover of the sales catalogue: ‘Stow original’, means it’s the original copy annotated by Mr Stow who was doing the purchasing. The ‘[W] draft … lot 278’ is an indicator that it was likely bought for Henry Wellcome’s private collection (this could be the other meaning to the “privately purchased” annotations on the accession registers etc.). However, the [W] doesn’t appear anywhere other than the sales catalogue (the inventory index card states H.M.M. which is the museum) so it’s possible that it was purchased for Wellcome’s private collection originally, and eventually moved to the Wellcome Historical Medical Museum before later being dispersed. Inside the sales catalogue: “Special Carved tusk | Carved ivory – negotiate” [in blue crayon]. The style, and handwriting of this makes us think this bit might be written by Henry Wellcome himself. “30/-“ [price is circled] “4/15/- Brought away” [referring to the printed text in the lot description: ‘and a carved tusk’.] The note ‘brought away’ is a bit puzzling. We’re not sure if the tusk was taken away rather than waiting to be shipped, or if it was part of the main sale or removed separately because it didn’t make it to the public sale.’ The auction catalogue images show that the sale at Phillips, Son & Neale’s took place on 15 October, 1925. It was a private sale for ‘The Property of a Gentleman, removed from Hendon’. The auction lots consist of household items and furniture including lot 278 which contains furniture and ‘a carved tusk’. As transcribed and explained by Nicola Cook, the handwriting seems to be by Wellcome himself. Figure 3: Detail of sales catalogue Phillips, Son and Neale's_15-10-1925, WA/HMM/CM/Sal/15/290 The sales catalogue suggests that the tusk belonged to a private individual living near Hendon but no further information is given and Alexandra Eveleigh, Collections Information Manager of the Wellcome Collection (a.eveleigh@wellcome.org) confirmed on 12 August 2021 that it may be difficult to find further information about the seller: ‘The sales catalogues are very frustrating in the paucity of the information typically recorded about the vendors of items. In this case I would need to peek underneath the pasted in sheet on the back of the front cover to be certain, but since 278 appears to have been an early lot in the sale on 15 October, I think its most likely that lot 278 was also from the ‘gentleman, removed from Hendon’. From other Benin objects’ research, I am discovering that it might occasionally be possible to make a connection to a named individual via what is known about other objects purchased in the same sale, though this is rare. I am hoping that this is something that might become more feasible though as our transcription project proceeds, as it becomes easier to compare Wellcome’s purchases from the same sale.’ New information not yet in Provenance #2 It is now confirmed that TM-2289-3 was indeed in the Wellcome collection and was bought from a private individual at an auction in London on 15 October 1925. The purchase was probably made by Henry Wellcome himself. Further possible conclusions It is interesting that neither the sales catalogue nor the Wellcome accession register identifies the tusk as a Benin piece though from its characteristics this seems obvious and the Royal Scottish Museum indeed identified it as such. The year 1925, 28 years after the military campaign against Benin City, may indicate that the previous owner was a military person related to the campaign who passed away. The fact that the tusk was combined in one lot with other household items further confirms this assumption.
Cultuur (NB: ook thesaurusterm aanpassen!)
ethnic attribution
Bini
Deelcollectie
department and institution
Materiële cultuurcollectie
Verwervingsdatum
accession date
1953-11-16
Wijze van verwerving
accession method
Schenking
Literatuur
bibliography
1) Wingert, P.S., The Sculptures of -Africa. 2) Luschan, F. von, Alterthümer von Benin. 3) Marquart, J. Die Benin Sammlung des Reichsmuseums für Völkerkunde in Leiden
Publicaties over het object
bibliography
For more information about the provenance, see <a href="https://issuu.com/tropenmuseum/docs/2021_provenance_2__benin__e-book" target="_blank"> Provenance #2 – the Benin collections at the National Museum of World Cultures </a> (NB: Issuu uses cookies).<BR> <BR> Bekijk dit object in 3D (NB: Sketchfab maakt gebruik van cookies):<BR> <div class="sketchfab-embed-wrapper"> <iframe title="Pedometer" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen="true" webkitallowfullscreen="true" allow="autoplay; fullscreen; xr-spatial-tracking" xr-spatial-tracking execution-while-out-of-viewport execution-while-not-rendered web-share src="https://sketchfab.com/models/f835ae78dd034f6798e03d6773a89aee/embed"> </iframe> <p style="font-size: 13px; font-weight: normal; margin: 5px; color: #4A4A4A;"> <a href="https://sketchfab.com/3d-models/pedometer-f835ae78dd034f6798e03d6773a89aee?utm_medium=embed&utm_campaign=share-popup&utm_content=f835ae78dd034f6798e03d6773a89aee" target="_blank" style="font-weight: bold; color: #1CAAD9;"> Pedometer </a> by <a href="https://sketchfab.com/mroest?utm_medium=embed&utm_campaign=share-popup&utm_content=f835ae78dd034f6798e03d6773a89aee" target="_blank" style="font-weight: bold; color: #1CAAD9;"> FloatScans </a> on <a href="https://sketchfab.com?utm_medium=embed&utm_campaign=share-popup&utm_content=f835ae78dd034f6798e03d6773a89aee" target="_blank" style="font-weight: bold; color: #1CAAD9;">Sketchfab</a></p></div>
Objectstatus
legal status
Eigendom
Met dank aan (online getoond)
Periode (NB: ook thesaurusterm aanpassen!)
Verkorte naam
AFRIK
Sensitive Content

Digital Benin collates digital material from institutions, and some of this material is inherently colonial and contains words, terms and phrases that are inaccurate, derogatory and harmful towards African and African diasporic communities. Catalogue transcriptions, book titles, exhibition titles and museum titles may contain harmful terms. We recognise the potential for the material to cause physical and mental distress as well as evoke strong emotions. Owing to the scale of the collection’s data, a process to implement sensitive-content warnings in the displayed data is still incomplete. The material within the catalogue does not represent Digital Benin’s views. Digital Benin maintains a strong anti-colonial, anti-racist position and affirms its support for centring the humanity of historically marginalised and disenfranchised communities. Read more about the background of this statement here