Object Number
1979.206.21
Edo designations
English designations
Bird of Prophecy Staff
Categories
Musical Instruments
Ceremonial Objects
Staffs
Location
1000 5th Ave, New York, NY 10028, United States
Loading...

Iconographies

2 annotations
Ubanu'hi / Obanu'hi
Ubanu'hi / Obanu'hi
Inifinity Symbol

The Ubanu'hi (infinity symbol) is a kind of guilloche or interlaced strapwork motif that can be angular or rounded. It was used by Edo artists in the decoration of many Emwin Arhe (royal treasures) and is ubiquitous in Benin royal arts. Ubanu'hi is a shortened form of “uba no Ọba ya de agbon ke ehimwin yi”, which means “the rope with which the Ọba ties the heaven and earth together” (pers. comm. Chief John Igbineweka Inneh n’Igbesawman, 2022). Similarly, Paula Ben-Amos Girshick (in Plankensteiner 2007, pp. 339, 341) described this as “Ọba n’iri agbon”, or the “rope of the world” pattern.

According to Ọbabanmu Ineh (in Blackmun 1984, p. 51), the use of this motif indicates that objects were carved by members of the Igbesanmwan. However, the motif is found on all types of Emwin Arhe (royal treasures), not only those made of ivory or wood. On the flanges of the Ama (relief plaques) alone, Kathryn Gunsch (2018, pp. 75–77) identified three different versions of the Ubanu'hi and, through her analysis of over 850 plaques, found that these different Ubanu'hi forms align with other characteristics, such as dimensions, the prevalence of ornamental motifs, and stylistic qualities. Together, these provide evidence, she argues, of different production groups among the plaque makers .

Kate Ezra (1992, pp. 209, 264) went on to argue that the use of these motifs indicates that certain objects were used in a “royal context” and were associated with “royal patronage”.

1 annotation
Ubanu'hi / Obanu'hi
Ahianmwẹ-Ọrọ
Bird of Prophecy

The Ahianmwẹ-Ọrọ, meaning ‘bird of prophecy’ in English, is a bird with a long beak believed to be a messenger of the spirit world. If it cries ‘OyaO’ (disgrace), it portends danger or disaster. If it cries ‘Oliguegue’ (be grateful), it portends good favour, fortune, or luck. If it persistently cries ‘OyaO, OyaO’ in front of someone, it is prophesying that the person should be cautious and should not undertake a journey, or should return home rather than continue. But if the bird cries ‘Oliguegue’ continuously, the journey will be favourable.

In 1515, as Ọba Ẹsigie passed through the gates of Benin on his way to fight the Attah (king) of Idah, the Ahianmwẹ-Ọrọ made discouraging sounds overhead, ‘OyaO, OyaO’, portending that disaster lay ahead. The Ọba ordered the bird to be killed and went on to win the war. He said, ‘Nẹ O gha yin Agbon, ghẹi daho Ahianmwẹ notiẹ oya’ (whoever wishes to succeed in life should not heed the bird of prophecy). On the Ọba’s triumphant return from battle, he commissioned the Igun-Eronmwon to make an image of the bird on the finial of a battle standard to remind it that the Ọba was not subject to the fate of ordinary spirits (personal communication, Patrick Oronsaye, 2022).

The identification of which bird the Ahianmwẹ-Ọrọ represents has been a subject of scholarly debate throughout the 20th century. Some have suggested that the bird is an African pied wagtail (Melzian 1937, p. 5), an ibis (Dark 1962, p. 46), possibly a kind of kingfisher (Ben-Amos 1976, p. 252), a hornbill (McCall 1975, p. 293), or, lastly, a white-tailed ant thrush (Nevadomsky 1988, pp. 76–77). In the case of the Ahianmwẹ-Ọrọ, however, Joseph Nevadomsky (1988, p. 77) posited that the exact species being represented was in fact less important. Instead, the aim was to “convey certain notions about the supernatural powers of the Ọba” and that the physical attribute (e.g., the long beak) was in fact the Ọba Ẹsigie’s casters’ way of seeking to “emphasise its vocal powers of prophecy, and, perhaps more importantly, the overcoming of these powers by the Ọba.”

1 annotation
Ahianmwẹ-Ọrọ

Provenance

7 events
Production
unknown to February 22, 1897 (day approximate)
The object was produced by Unknown member(s) of the Igun-Ẹrọnmwọn guild in Benin City.
Looted
February 22, 1897 (day approximate) to June 1899 (year approximate)
The object was looted by February 1897 Unknown member of the British colonial military campaign on Benin from Benin Kingdom.
Unknown
1945 to 1952
The object is known to have come into contact with Webster Plass and Margaret Feurer Plass, later in London.
Unknown
1945 to 1955
The object is known to have come into contact with Margaret Feurer Plass, Webster Plass and Julius Carlebach, later in New York City.
Purchase
1955
The object was purchased by Nelson Aldrich Rockefeller from Julius Carlebach and Julius Carlebach Gallery in New York City.
Loan
1956 to 1978
The object was loaned by Nelson Aldrich Rockefeller to New York Museum of Primitive Arts in New York City.
Bequest
1979
The object was bequeathed by Nelson Aldrich Rockefeller to the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York City.

Institution data

Metropolitan Museum of Art
The data was transferred directly by the institution.
Last updated: 2021-07-30
Language: english
Institution fieldValue
Object Number
object id
1979.206.21
Object Sort Number
object id
1979 206 21
Primary Rendition No
object id
vs1979_206_21-d
Title
designation
object type
Idiophone: Bird of Prophecy (ahianmwen-oro)
Medium
material
Bronze
Dimensions
dimensions
H. 14 1/4 × W. 5 5/8 × D. 6 in. (36.2 × 14.3 × 15.2 cm)
Classification
object type
Metal-Musical Instruments
Date
date made
16th century
Geo: City
production place
Court of Benin
Geo: Country
production place
Nigeria
Credit Line
prior source
The Michael C. Rockefeller Memorial Collection, Bequest of Nelson A. Rockefeller, 1979
Provenance
provenance
Webster Plass, London; [Julius Carlebach Gallery, New York, until 1955]; Nelson A. Rockefeller, New York, 1955, on loan to The Museum of Art, New York, 1956–1978Court of Benin Objects in the Michael C. Rockefeller Wing, Metropolitan Museum of Art
Dynasty
reign associated name
Oranmiyan
Culture
ethnic attribution
Edo peoples
ExhibitionHistory
exhibition history
Sculpture in Metal: Bronzes from Benin/Gold from theAmericas Museum of Art, October 29, 1958–February 8,1959 African Sculpture Indiana University, September 28, 1961–October 19,1961 Masterpieces of African and Oceanic Art Des Moines Art Center, February 16, 1962–April 1,1962 McCormack Place Gallery, April 29, 1962–June 1,1962 Techniques and Materials of Art Museum of Art, July 22, 1966–October 23,1966 Benin Museum of Fine Arts, Houston, September 21, 1968–November 24,1968 New Orleans Museum of Art, December 15, 1968–January 15,1969 Art of Oceania, Africa and the Americas from The Museum of Art The Metropolitan Museum of Art, May 10, 1969–August 17,1969 Sculpture of : Nigeria &Cameroon The Metropolitan Museum of Art, June 23, 1971–March 19,1972 The Art of Nigeria and Cameroon South Huntington Public Library, New York, February 5, 1973–March30, 1973
Bibliography
bibliography
Girshick Ben‑Amos, Paula. The Art of Benin. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1995. LaGamma, Alisa. Art and Oracle: African Art and Rituals of Divination. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2000. The Metropolitan Museum of Art. Art of Oceania, Africa, and the Americas from the Museum of Art. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 1969, no. 372.
Published References
bibliography
Sensitive Content

Digital Benin collates digital material from institutions, and some of this material is inherently colonial and contains words, terms and phrases that are inaccurate, derogatory and harmful towards African and African diasporic communities. Catalogue transcriptions, book titles, exhibition titles and museum titles may contain harmful terms. We recognise the potential for the material to cause physical and mental distress as well as evoke strong emotions. Owing to the scale of the collection’s data, a process to implement sensitive-content warnings in the displayed data is still incomplete. The material within the catalogue does not represent Digital Benin’s views. Digital Benin maintains a strong anti-colonial, anti-racist position and affirms its support for centring the humanity of historically marginalised and disenfranchised communities. Read more about the background of this statement here